Download Access to Religion and Philosophy. Ethical Theory by Mel Thompson PDF

By Mel Thompson

The 3rd variation of moral concept has been up-to-date in accordance with the revised a degree specification specifications. It presents a vital heritage to moral matters via giving an summary of significant moral theories and the way those will be utilized to various modern ethical concerns. the hot variation combines the entire strengths of the second one version with a brand new layout and lines to make the content material extra obtainable to all scholars in an effort to strengthen their realizing of the subject. New gains contain: - Key questions through the chapters to assist scholars concentrate on the most important matters - key words outlined and defined during the chapters - Profiles of key participants - their contribution and value - extra precis diagrams all through to assist revision - photographs and illustrations - Revision checklists on the finish of chapters - New exam-style questions and information on the finish of every bankruptcy.

Show description

Read or Download Access to Religion and Philosophy. Ethical Theory PDF

Best ethics & morality books

Einleitung in die Systematische Theologie (De Gruyter Studium)

The writer provides an advent to Systematic Theology which illustrates the fundamental dating among dogmatics and ethics. This dating relies at the concept that faith and human habit correlate internally. the purpose is to explain Christian life as a fashion of residing in accountability earlier than God and with dedication to the typical strong of society, which gives the required exterior body of the church as a non secular neighborhood and its lifestyles in love and wish.

On compromise and rotten compromises

While is political compromise acceptable--and while is it essentially rotten, whatever we must always by no means settle for, someway? What if a rotten compromise is politically useful? Compromise is a smart political advantage, in particular for the sake of peace. yet, as Avishai Margalit argues, there are ethical limits to appropriate compromise even for peace.

Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, Justice

Anger isn't just ubiquitous, it's also renowned. many of us imagine it really is most unlikely to care sufficiently for justice with no anger at injustice. Many think that it's very unlikely for people to vindicate their very own self-respect or to maneuver past an damage with out anger. not to believe anger in these instances will be thought of suspect.

Extra resources for Access to Religion and Philosophy. Ethical Theory

Example text

Either in the area of human emotions expressed through them, or in the courses of action that such statements might prescribe – the first leads to emotivism and the second to prescriptivism. Both theories avoid the claim that moral statements are meaningless, by pointing to the evidence of what actually happens when moral statements are made – for, whether or not they are meaningless in themselves, it is clear that moral statements do actually express emotions and recommend courses of action. It is possible to argue that moral statements are means by which we overcome selfish perspectives.

M. This approach was taken by R. M. Hare (The Language of Morals [1952] and Freedom and Reason [1963]). He argued that a moral statement is ‘prescribing’ a course of action, recommending that something should be done, not just expressing a feeling. On the other hand, moral statements are rather more than commands. A command is simply a request to do a particular thing at a particular moment, whereas a moral statement is making a more general suggestion about what action should be taken. In other words, a moral statement is both prescriptive and also universalisable: suggesting what everyone should do in the circumstances.

In other words, to claim that you are acting responsibly requires you to take ‘responsibility’ for what you are doing; you cannot claim, at one and the same time, to be morally responsible and also incapable of making a free choice. To say ‘I just felt like it’ is not a moral justification. Equally, moral responsibility implies that you can weigh up the values by which you choose to live and can assess the extent to which these conform to both the immediate social and legal rules and the wider demands of universal moral norms.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.76 of 5 – based on 46 votes